I like AU-58 for this one.
I'd like to buy a vowel please, no wait I'm going to use my phone-a-friend...:D
My guess is MS63. GUESS.....
As soon as you get it in hand send it back for a refund. Were you really the winner of this auction? $700 is the first clue that it's a fake.
MS64PL - maybe 65 if all that fuss on the cheek is just frost breaks. MS66 - I agree with dwhiz but I'll guess it didn't get held back. Very nice...
Who knew fermenting concord grapes could produce such wonderful toning....:eek::rolleyes:...
First read through this thread for I-phone imageryhttps://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=160092&whichpage=1 Then this thread when...
Easy MS64 assuming the reverse hairlines are on the holder.
[ATTACH]
Now that has to be a mechanical error...:)
It's my go to.
Yep, natural. Scroll down to the 1879 obverse in the color mapping section.http://www.jhonecash.com/research/sunnywood_classification.asp
So, any theories on what held it back from GEM?
AU53. Great skin!
You are correct Okie, both are idiots assuming someone would snap at that rotten worn.
No, the etsy seller in the OP link of course.
Idiots with way more spare time than intelligence.
Just goes to show you, tax cuts do not translate to decreased spending.
I think it just misses 40, VF35.
I agree with MS66RB. A stunning coin no matter what NGC chose for the numerical grade. Is there a star?
Separate names with a comma.