Keep in mind, mine was purchased for work many years ago along with several digital micrometers. I agree they would be over-kill for a collector...
Mine is a Mitutoyo. Not cheap but high quality.
The M was cut using a box cutter knife.
What little is left of them anyways....
AU53
I'm not saying you should or shouldn't, but if you switch to 2.5's you should study the series first. I hear it abounds with counterfeits...
That is an impressive die gouge.
Coin cidence? I think not...:)
I'm late but, it appears the reverse is not quite PL. There are many one siders from the '78-'82 San Fran era.
MS65BN and just to be different I'll say ACG...
AU50 maybe 53
I say keep both as well but if only one is needed keep the green label example.
I agree with @ToughCOINS, that thing is hammered. 65 if MS or 64 if PR. But then this is not my series either...
I'll say it's an attractive MS62. At MS63 it would be average at best but then we're only talking about an FMV difference of about $25.
AU58
Most sane people wouldn't even consider this as part of a type set. Way to go!!!!!:woot:
Nowadays a seller cannot leave a negative to a buyer unless something has changed?
Been there, done that with similar results luckily....
Regardless of what is visible or not in the images, if there is displacement of the fields it has to be a retained CUD.
Separate names with a comma.
