Conder, Was it struck in 1792?
I'm still trying to figure out what a "1760 Voce Pupuli" is. ;)
After inspecting the latest photos, I agree. Some dirt/verdegris has clearly been removed from around the devices and other protected areas of...
62 and 63 respectively are my guesses. I'd say 64 on the last coin, but the hit to the left of liberty's nose is a bit large.
That does not look like a coin struck in 1792.
They're all pretty cool, but I'm a sucker for big gold, and the Lib double eagle stands out!
p.s.s. Typically, when you see one of these "head scratcher" grades, there's something wrong with the coin that is not immediately obvious. Like...
p.s. I'm not convinced from the photos that the coin is AT/QT, nor that it was net graded as a result. I'd have to see the coin in-hand to be...
First off, the photo has been juiced. Second, you are 100% correct, IMO. PCGS will net grade a QT coin down. You see it (now) with the blue...
65 or 66 or 67 RD - depending on just how booming the luster is in-hand.
We all have to learn somehow. Just be happy it was on a relatively cheap coin. :) Have fun...Mike p.s. I would NOT send this coin to PCGS....
Cool cud!
Just found out about this website, complete with 10,000 images of counterfeit coins. Take a look and let us know what you think.......
As the first commemorative, these coins survived in huge numbers. Because supply outstrips demand, the price of these coins has remained low.
Separate names with a comma.
