1853 N-13 R-1
1852 looks like N-17 R-1
1851 looks like n-6 r-1
looks like 1850 is n-15 r-2
I would think they would fix the error yes.
Date position was my first go to. As far as early vs late die stage there are lines on reverse that are visible early but not in late stage.
Going with N-20 late die state on the 1849 R-1
1848 looks like N-35 which is R-2
looking closer at reverse I see some lumps on the E in cent that are in the right spots. Also a faint line connecting the top and bottom of same...
this is a tough one. I am not sure this is a tall date. With the date position and repunching under the one it looks like N-5 to me but I cannot...
the date position and those lines on the reverse by MER gave it away
N-5 which is R-1 rarity
gotcha.
$5 is cheap price but what's the end goal on these crippled cents?
moderate date no shill obverse.star 8 points between dentils.Foot of T well below foot of R. Reverse has square serif letters tiny or missing...
it does look like an N-14 which in Wrights book was an R-8- in 1992
can certainly give it a try.
yes I did the attribution. Easy one as it has all 4 digits repunched to the left. It is challenging at times to use that book and try your hand...
yes it has a little bit but i believe it will come off wit a bit of acetone and verdicare. Not irreversible yet.
this one looked pretty decent for the price. $55 I was thinking EAC grade of 35 or xf grade from the big grading spots. [ATTACH][ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
