Unfortunately it's a counterfeit. From what I can see from this image the date position is wrong and the base of the E . P is wrong. Sorry to be...
I missed the small window of opportunity for this GTG....:(
The only reason for me to purchase a Morgan in this condition would be if it were a rare variety. Being it's an A2 reverse it is not a valuable...
66RD
+1
That Morgan is likely a VAM-4 which is known with rotated reverse die.
Careful now, I'm sure the Bing Bot is watching....:rolleyes:
Or any of the other search engines for that matter....
True words of wisdom... Wish I had a dollar for every time I did this....;)
1839 was a transition year for the large cent and 1916 for the dime and quarter coins. A 1916 SLQ may be cost prohibitive however...
And it looks like heat may have been applied when doing so.
It looks like the C3 reverse with the fourth obverse star not broken. See the linked attribution...
I think you may have the clashed die state of VAM-14. There are several die markers on the page to compare to your coin for verification....
We're going to need bigger obverse and reverse images.
Yep, natural. Welcome to the forum @Coinmanryan
If so then the rest of our coins should be changed 5 pennies, 10 pennies, 25 pennies and 50 pennies to avoid confusion....
It looks like a struck through error to me.
Well it's obvious someone wanted him gone and unfortunately for him he took the bait and swallowed the hook.
MS63PL
Yep, that's what kept me at 65. It's a beautiful example nonetheless. Oh, and great images Justin!
Separate names with a comma.
