Vg 6
That may be the coolest thing I've read in months! Congrats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From face value to millions of dollars.
I agree with your assessment. Furthermore, I think that you shouldn't settle. The coins I'm disappointed in most in my collection are those that...
p.s. the photos make it really hard for me to grade it though -- so a low level of confidence in the above comments.
I'd grade the coin a solid (and original-looking) XF 45 and suspect ANACS graded it a 55.
No need to go to all that trouble -- I just was wondering because I didn't see a print in the photos. Regardless, that's a cool coin, and thank...
Naw, I'd give it a 45 at least. ;)
I guess I'll be the one to ask the stupid question... What fingerprint?
Wow, I'm bad at grading these coins -- at least I got the color correct. ;) As for the fancy 5 versus plain 5 -- and without going to any...
63 rb & 64 bn
Johnny, Please don't take my XF comment as a hit against the coin. It wasn't intended in that way at all and to the contrary, I like the coin and...
I think raw coins look the best. ;) That said, I prefer the look of the PCGS slabs.
This post is funny on several levels... First, that Eduard thought "peeps" was shorthand for numismatist. Second, that the one who confused...
That coin looks like an XF coin that the TPGs would grade high-end AU (55-58)....Mike
Looks like one of the hoard coins. A really attractive coin, details wise. Too bad about the spots/corrosion.
Although I would argue that the 40% spread really varies by series and/or dealer, the above post is otherwise 100% correct and should be required...
Why not just buy some muratic acid? ;)
p.s. it's too bad too, because the coin is VERY well struck for the issue -- I'd say top 5%.
The apparent hairlines on the coin lead me to assign a "MS details, cleaned, net XF" grade to the coin.
Separate names with a comma.
