I grade it impossible. Impossible to grade from a single static photo of each side that is. My guess however is MS65...;)
Texas Numismatic Association. They have a big show every year.
Here's one of the Morgan Dollars I picked up at the TNA show this spring.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That image sure makes it look like a staple scratch. If it is not as pronounced as the TV glamour shot makes it out to be I'm guessing the reverse...
I would have hung a uey for that one as well...Well played..:) And it's a no line fatty to boot....where's Jet Lee? @jtlee321
You're welcome! :) It is typical strike quality for a VAM-22A..I've been trying to pick one of these from the wild for years. While it's far...
A recent cherry pick from ebay...:)[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
63PL
I think 66 is within reach as well.
Wow, I feel like I just cheated on my collection...:oops: Great stuff!!!!:woot:
It wouldn't shock me if the coin looked nothing like this when encapsulated....at any rate not market acceptable in my opinion.
Heirloom coins are the best my friend.. I have several from my mom and both of my grandmothers. :)
:) [ATTACH]
I gave it the benny of the doubt and went MS64. I'll venture a guess of VAM-8. That's some wicked pull away toning btw...:)
This one stands out for me... [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Assembling the run of 02 through 45 is relatively easy from an availability standpoint for '93-S (the availability of funds may a little more...
A '93-s grade set would be cool....
I went AU58. I think there's enough disturbance to warrant slightly circulated.
I went 65 as well but the eye appeal may have pushed it beyond. Exceptional example...
Welcome to CT. The sarcastic emoji is right here...:shifty::troll::vomit::wacky::yack::yuck::mad::confused::p:eek::rolleyes:o_O
Separate names with a comma.
