I like the toning on these two... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] 'dude
[ATTACH]
Apologies... this is all I can offer. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] 'dude
Hey ST, did you sell your roll of silver HDs? I'd be interested in still available. thanks, C'dude
Nothing really "rare"... just tough to come by... [ATTACH]
Looks to be one of the nicest AU-58s I've seen in awhile for a DBD. 'dude
Been looking forward to acquiring this date for awhile now. I think I was able to finally check all the blocks with this particular example. One...
Did somebody say Charlotte? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Depends on how the toning makes the coin look. Sometimes toning gives a coin negative eye appeal, which will affect value... sometimes it turns...
A few new things... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] 'dude
I'll be there. 'dude
I ducked out of work and went to Baltimore today. For me, the show was mostly underwhelming. Aside from a couple of nice, high-grade early gold...
1799 Half Eagle / Large Stars Reverse - the rarer variety of a mintage totaling 7,451 for the year. [ATTACH] 'dude
Looks AU to me... low AU, but AU nonetheless. 'dude
This... it's about as close to an "error" coin as I have - [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Great post... love all the pics. Thanks for the time & effort to put this on the board. 'dude
OP's coin doesn't appear to have the normal die markers authentic '37-D 3 leggers normally have. I'd be concerned... 'dude
1st) Nicks on the forehead 2nd) Tooling or intentional rubbing over entire cheek to conceal what looks like what was an even more prominent gash...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nice looking group of gold and and all look mostly accurately graded, except for the 1906 QE, which looks like an MS-62/63. 'dude
Separate names with a comma.