Agreed. Need more photos.
It does look off. The surface corrosion might be there to obscure details to raise the question of authenticity or not. The surface finish looks...
Abrasive cloth marks on the rear. Fingerprint perhaps on the front.
Very cool, Randy!!
There you go. An expat of a different origin. I hear from friends of the family that just recently closed on their second home in Spain that...
Thank you for the recommendation. I have 2 books (one is Madison’s notes) and this is the third book I’m reading now. As another coincidence,...
I was under the impression that you were an American abroad, but maybe I have that wrong and read that in by your tag. In any regard, thank you...
Lewis & Clark = 2004 Your 2005’s are showing typical toning. The one on the right is showing some signs of grease affecting the surface finish...
@Mikec This is a setup with my old iPhone 5 - [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Loomis gouging. Profits are up 14%.
I was sent to place the laundry in the dryer and this is what I found at the bottom of the washer - [ATTACH] Sadly, a better date LWC worn smooth.
The more significant specimens are interesting.
My guess is that any year single squeeze might have a double ear. Honestly…I never invested any time looking. At the start, people were finding...
The second T in STATES is tilted.
It may be an off center strike but we need to see a photo of the reverse to confirm. More than likely it is a misaligned die strike using an...
Could be anything…maybe from a sneeze. Welcome to CT!!
It was different in the 70s and 80s. Finding older LWCs with mint marks was a thing…not prevalent…but with volume you could find some lower...
When I would CRH, it would take me a couple of weeks to go through a box of cents (2-3 hours in the evenings). Lots of varieties to hunt. For...
I think worth another view! That’s a fun find!
With a lot range of 1909-1929, you’ll want to take your time. The Red Book will help but only identifies a select few of potential variety coins...
Separate names with a comma.