I thought 63.5. I guessed 63.
If you would have had 67 as a choice I woudl have chosen that. Nice coin. Guessed 66.
There goes the neighborhood! Hi Shane!....MikeInFL
It is always easier to pick out the shortcomings of others than it is to impartially examine and improve our own behavior. Such is human nature,...
The problem, of course, is that you lose a few % on each buy sell of physical bullion, effectively wiping out any gain. ETFs might be a thought,...
OK... I would take NGC and CAC over any of you grading/assessing the coin from photos. It is also worth noting that CAC does not assess the * on...
"Which slabbing company is the most accurate in grading and brings the biggest premium" I would argue that NGC is the most accurate and PCGS...
I would take NGC and CAC over any of you grading/assessing the coin from photos. It is also worth noting that CAC does not assess the * on the coin.
Welcome back.
I was looking for the box with "too many" next to it. :)
If it grades, 40.
You are welcome. Happy to help. :)
p.p.s. numismedia tends to not be accurate for moderns. good sources of price data for moderns such as your 1993 proof jefferson is (a) ebay, and...
p.s. generally speaking, ultra cameo (NGC) = deep cameo (PCGS)
Considering that you can but an entire proof set for almost that amount, and most of those coins would grade 69, I would say you did badly....
When you look at a coin at arms length, what catches your attention first? A small mark that's perhaps 1/32 of an inch large and can hardly be...
63/64
I guessed 66, but the more I look at it, I think 67. Regardless, I wonder if the milk spots were on the coin when graded.
66 luster wins over hits
These proofs are generally graded by harilines or lack thereof. The photos don't show any, but that doesn't mean they're not there. I will...
Separate names with a comma.
