All I have are these hazed proofs. ;) [img][img] [img][img] Flash the first one into the light, and it becomes my avatar....Mike
Second best, again. Well done ddoomm!
66
63bn, maybe 64. Guessed 63.
Fields of a 66 or 67. I guessed 6 because of (an apparent) lack of blazing luster.
Nice coins and pics. The pics appear to be a bit oversharpened. Can you explain?
Didn't one of the books (one of the Sheldon editions?) have a pic of the set? p.s. I agree with you, the variation of color wasn't nearly as...
p.s. the 2000 lincoln posted appears to have die polish marks (or some odd plating anomaly) - quite different from what we are discussing here.
100% of the respondents ATS believe the mint filed planchets, not finished coins. I suppose they are all misinformed. And you're right, I still...
p.s. to the OP, that's a wonderful coin. Congrats on your NEWP.
That coin is undergraded (according to NGC standards), IMO. That coin looks F-12 to me.
Maybe it got caught in a coin counting machine. ;) Just giving you a hard time, G. You know I still love you. :)
p.s. perhaps you might consider posting one at a time over a longer length of time. I would respond then. As it is -- just too many coins....
I like your coins and thank you for sharing, but you've posted way too many coins for me to grade at once.
I agree 100%.
split between 66 and 67. guessed 67
I'm not familiar with the mechanics of a coin counting machine, but I am still having a tough time imagining anything that could damage the fields...
That's a very good point, in general. However, not for the the coin in question, IMO. That said, if you look through a whole bunch of circulated...
Separate names with a comma.
