I am anything but an expert, and I did not compare it to any real 16-d's, but the coin looks good to me.
63 or 64, depending on how bad the hit below E PLURIB is on the obverse in hand.
58 sounds about right.
I saw Brian suggest something similar in the thread ATS (although he was less authoritative than you are above). However, that doesn't explain...
Look at the luster! I guessed 66.
64rd. 65 would not surprise me.
RLM, What the heck are you doing with an AU 53 coin in your collection? :)
EAC grade VF 30 details, Skud, net F 12. TPG grade XF details. Wholesale value, about $200.
"I think this 1909 VDB I bought is a Proof!" Unfortunately, I don't. The strike is not sharp enough, nor is are the rims wide and square enough,...
Inexperience? Needed another coin to send to round out a submission? Sentimental value? To settle a bet? Humor? A variety? Who knows?
Auctions are not a retail setting. What I'm telling you is that there are a great number of retail outlets (i.e. dealers) of PCGS coins, to...
Those coins are SOOOOO cool. I hope to own one someday. I'd be happy with a VG. lol
Nice coin. The obverse appears to be a bit dark on the lower left, but overall a very nice coin that I suspect looks even better in-hand.
That's a nice 65. I wouldn't have second-guessed a 66.
65 BN, but an NGC 66 wouldn't surprise me either.
64 because of the large spot.
Nice 93-S!!!
67rd
I see your photobucket pics. :) 66rd
Still blank for me. :(
Separate names with a comma.
