Well I can guarantee you won't find a quote like that from me because I would never make a statement like that.
I agree with Rascal that it's a clash. In the next bay you can see the back of Lincolns coat. It's the most common place for a clash on memorials.
If you get a 67CAM or better it's well worth it. If it's a UCAM you're sitting very pretty.
I would think that since the lines are on the raised devices that it's likely a planchet issue?
That's a cool one. Wonder how many more coins were struck before that piece broke off completely?
Those are clash marks. You need to look at more coins.:smile
It's been ages since I've heard that. Congrats taco and the other winners and thanks for the giveaways noob!
I absolutely agree that returns should be allowed to insure that you get a good usable product, whether you are buying a coin for your collection...
+1 :smile
Would this include say, someone buying 1000 mint sets from the mint and cherrying them for 70s and then returning 950 of them that didn't cut it....
73 thanks for the chance!
It happens. There are a lot of collectors that don't know about, or look for varieties. Yeah you probably won't find any key dates or a three...
That would be a good clue that it's fake.
If you can determine that it's not a nick it might be worth submitting.
I'm curious now how many were submitted. Maybe people thought it wasn't worth the effort to get them graded given the performance of other clad...
Last I heard, there were no MS70s.
This one shows out of stock. I did pick up some of the other ones though. Thanks, TC
Well now, there's a little more evidence huh? Thanks for the effort in posting these Danr , I guess I could have looked myself. :o
Last i heard the '96 WAM was just a rumor and there has never been one actually certified. There is a '96 DDO however, I do know that.
I don't think you can base a trend on one auction and say that thats what something is worth. Most new mint issues usually get a boost right after...
Separate names with a comma.
