But what if there are more than 100K collectors that want one. If something is hot and in demand it doesn't matter if there's a one household...
A really obvious cheesy cast fake.
66
.
I agree with all the previously mentioned and I'll also add rlm and Hobo to the list of very knowledgable and helpful posters that deserve a mention.
I agree, most collectors are after the reverse proof, it's the star attraction. So far the set is the only way to get it ................ so far.
I think I remember hearing it's being minted to demand, but don't quote me on that.
Maybe the lighting makes the hit on the cheek look worse than it really is. I'm thinking 63 but might go higher if I saw it in person. I'll bet...
I guess it's what you're familiar with that you makes you think what someone could have used. As a machinist my first thought was a spotfacer...
If there was debris stuck on the die it will leave a depression on the coin, not a raised area. I agree with rlm that it's pretty beat up and that...
Welcome rookie, that would have to be post mint damage (PMD). There's no way for it to have been struck like that.
And I haven't spent enough.:( But your efforts are appreciated.
I know where you're coming from, but we shouldn't complain too much. Cause after her then we'll have this.:eek:
Wishing you well on your new venture. I wish you were on the other side of the state. We need more good coin shops around here.
I agree with you on the reverse proof. The 2006 was the first and is still the darling. Last years relatively low mintage issue and frenzy over...
My opinion is it's no on both #1 and #2. Here's another good site for Lincolns. http://www.coppercoins.com/advsearch.php
Drat foiled again! I'll have to go back to Lincolns.
Separate names with a comma.
