That's what I get for using my memory instead of the search button. As usual, I defer to your greater knowledge. Are you sworn to secrecy about...
The 1808 is S-279 most easily identified by the leaf tip under the center of the S on the Reverse C. This is the Holmes example:...
The 1803 is an S--250 with a fading shoulder line with the POC under the curve of B. The Reverse H had a distinctly low fraction bar and a...
The 1800 took a bit. It is a S-209 and either a Die State I or II. The stray vertical hair between the top two curls below the ribbon and Right...
I'll reply one at a time. The 1798 is a S-175 and really pretty. This is a link to the Holmes example with the same reverse CUD:...
I enjoy attributing those worn Large Cents and would honestly like to stir up interest in this series again. It was the first series that I know...
This appears to be a low grade unattributed S-182 with the bald spot above the 1 and reverse EE. Oddly enough, it's the one EE obverse I didn't...
This appears to be an unattributed S-162 R4 with a bit of detail, but some damage. Once again, almost rare with an estimate of 118-158 survivors....
You're welcome. I love identification more than ownership. Good thing!
I'm not into toning, but I think you have the BEST one.
It is without a doubt a fake. I refer you to the size of the stars and the gap between them. I checked all 4/5 obverses and they all have large...
Now that I've stopped drooling, I'll venture a guess for the rise of expensive coins tossed in with junk. I suspect that the increase in the...
Thanks! I don't see any more device detail, but there appears to be more corrosion and impact damage at all the significant points making me glad...
Separate names with a comma.
