This is an interesting coin because it appears to be something else on first glance. Good luck!...
This attitude personifies the lack of ethics and morality in the world. It's NOT OK just because you can get away with it. You can be assured I...
I came close. There was a very poor 1799 S-188 which was only identifiable by the late die state crack at RTY. That's a pretty long leap, but was...
I hit more than I miss, but my misses are usually shots at something different rather than something attributed. However, I have on occasion...
This is an unattributed 1798 with poor photos so the attribution is somewhat suspect. I believe it is a S-176 R4. The reverse is worn where the...
Thank you for your input. The reverse identification with the leaf under the right side of S rather than past it and the leaf at the tip of the...
This is what appears to be a S-168 R3. What I'm not seeing is the strong break around the legend. It is worn and possibly this is the reason. The...
F15 to VF20 depending on whether I owned it or you did.
I've forgotten which Tip we're on but here goes:...
I'm afraid I'm unfamiliar with modern Electrotypes. I just assumed they were all at least 80 years old. You know what they say about that...
From a purely economic viewpoint, every product has a value. It is governed by supply and demand, Problem coins are difficult to move because they...
Punctuation is KING! Use it ROYALLY.
My thought is N-2 on the Left and N-4 on the Right. A is too distant from the reverse right stem for the N-9.
I'll see your Apple Cheeks and raise you a Thick Hair; Close Date with a Close Right Stem. This is one of the poorly represented group of VF S-61s...
This is one of My misfit coins which is a nice way to describe the problem coins you are talking about. [IMG] Since this is copper, melt doesn't...
I think Conder101 has hit the nail on the head for the obverse pattern. It's odd to see an electrotype of a mismatched pairing (obverse of S-155...
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise...
You actually get good pictures if you scroll down and click the link in the description rather than enlarge the icons.
OK. I 'll go ahead and say it. #1. Type I hair with Type 2 Lettering. Definitely NOT a 1799 Obverse. The 1797 Obverse (21) with this pairing...
I thought I'd see if anyone can see what intrigues me about this eBay posting....
Separate names with a comma.
