While this is 'only' a VF20. It looks better to me than the AU58 in the #2 Collection. Yours is strong at the identifying feature and theirs is...
It seems like a reasonable request. One of the reasons there are so many threads is a new one is made every time someone gets into photography....
Early copper has a wide range of colors which come about from differences in stock planchets and differences in the storage conditions and ambient...
The coin looks good, but the photos need less color enhancement. Sometimes it is intentional, but sometimes it is an automatic setting on the...
Sample size is significant. If you search Thousands and find Hundreds, there is a significant problem. It is not necessary to search Millions or...
I have no clue.
N-3 Lot's of meat. Nice.
I've seen MUCH worse.
In the middle of 1798, a master Hub began being used on the reverse so the answer is yes and no. Many are from the same hub, but not all. And the...
It is 1820 N-1 or the Large (8 larger than 2) Overdate. R1 or common with no premium. But beware! Variety Collecting can be addicting.
At first glance, the falling berry left of and slightly above the O of ONE indicate the S-187. The obverse photo is too poor for the standard...
Then again maybe not. The S-106 also appears to have this 'bare' shoulder, but not quite as bold, so of little help on the lower end examples. But...
I was looking at your 'outer edge of 6 at continuation of neck' key and noticed another possible key. The lowest strand of hair appears incomplete...
I've missed a few of these lately. I think I need to take a break.
This is another 1796 Draped Bust. It is actually labeled correctly for a change as a Reverse of 94. This is the Sheldon Reverse U which was paired...
I don't recommend it, but my Cents have survived two marriages which didn't.
These are absolutely stunning examples. Are they in the Condition Census already or are they examples that would definitely change it?
With fresh eyes this morning, I think I know what I saw that wasn't there. The ribbon loop appears to be more rounded than it probably really is....
It seems like there should be enough there to verify the reverse, but I'm not having any luck. I'm either seeing something that isn't there that's...
Thanks for sharing Thanks for sharing these. It is not often that you see a coin which improves upon the similar example in the Holmes...
Separate names with a comma.
