Leave it in its cello. Take a picture and offer the picture. Once you take it out of the cello, the origin of the coin in no longer a question,...
I was mesmerized once back in the 60's by metal.. Oh wrong subject. exergue. Now there is a word you don't see everyday.. or any day for...
Jack, Jack, Jack.. I am shaking my head here... how could you do such a thing, you Jack of all people to make a mistake. oh my.. relax...
Could of been an S too..
Hmmm, taking a good look at the picture.. Looks like Arizona Jack to me.. OHhhhhhhhhhhhh Jack, tell us who the other guy is.. LOL...
I was just reading a post here about a pocket piece being purchased from a grandson of a deceased person. Then another poster mentioned a war...
Its the toning. Telling you, if its not blast white...... The coin is or at least very close to a 66. I see nothing other than toning wrong...
exactly $47.73, Tax title and destination charges included.
OK, here is my take on this coin and the reason I posted it here. I agree with the grade that NGC has assigned, PCGS gave it the same grade if...
Well, I can tell you with 100% certainty that they are not 100%. In 1967 they made 50% and 80%. They both weigh the same 2.33g and have the same...
#1 without a doubt. #2 has a spot in front of her face, #3 has what looks like a scratch on the obv in front of her face. #3 is a vam however....
Looks like the general consensus is the same across the board on this one EF-45
Mark, I am not up on the slabbing thing, thats good information. Thank you. Jim
Just noticed something else about this coin.. slab says. "S"... I don't see a mintmark either.
[IMG] Welcoming comments here. I have my own opinion and will share it soon.
Separate names with a comma.
