Really like your setup, but you are correct that stereo optical zoom trinocular is the best way to go...if you can stand the cost. But don’t...
@Mattellis ...blurry and pixelated photos completely negate your effort. You may be able to see it, but forum members cannot. Get yourself a...
@PassthePuck ...way cool chart...Spark
Quite a few forum members will tell you they absolutely abhor the copper plated zinc cent. I am one of those. Along this life’s journey you...
@Azariana ...1982 had 8 business strike varieties...and a 9th proof out of San Francisco...if another is found of the small date copper, it would...
@Lucky John ...we only tell you the truth, not what you want to hear. This site is dedicated to accurate information...Spark
@Neal ...no foolin’...straight from NGC website...Spark
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] With Curry Company Original Packaging. Currently lists approx. $45. Make me an offer I can’t refuse...Contact by...
@Freddiecallahan ...The mint made over 809 million of these, and everyone and his sister buttonholed them. Unless they are silver or MS60...
I don’t see anything abnormal with the B/LIBERTY, and no clue what the circular device is. I think I see doubling of the vest next to the date,...
Be sure to post a tight close-up of the mint mark for us when you do...please and thank you...Spark
This is a great go-to article to freshen up on the CAM/WAM specifics, useful to many. For clarity, however, the location of the designers...
@Michael Azarian ...just read post #13...obviously you no longer desire any further assistance from me. Best of luck to you...Spark
NO...it isn’t. Nowhere near ddr-001...but you are correct in that the die markers don’t match for ddr-002. And you still have not provided...
Reference post #5...I’ve looked at the ddr-002 at length. OP’s coin needs better pix and lighting to proceed. What I can see is maybe a contact...
Well...I don’t know what 1/3 means and I guess you’ll have to be more specific... In what way do they stand out? If doubling of some sort,...
Neither are “too close to call”...are plainly CAM...Spark
Too poorly lit to confirm ddr-002...but no die crack/die markers...Spark
Sorry...disagree...the obverse is 63, and the reverse is barely maintaining a 60, but 5FS, there are contact marks on steps 1, 3 and 5/6...but the...
Alex...from your pictures, this posted coin is no way near 64. On the obverse there are field abrasions and excessive contact marks, plus...
Separate names with a comma.
