What I'm seeing. But I don't always see what others see, [ATTACH]
I'm getting difficult to satisfy these days. The obverse R(T) appears too far left and is right of most on the S-172. Also, this coin has a weak,...
I'm not sure these are better, but these are my photos: [ATTACH]
I like the top one too because of fewer of the minor dings in the fields and consistent color. I must give a slight advantage in reverse detail to...
I just purchased this 1864 Indian Cent with a heavy clash on both the obverse and reverse and a little rotated. Undamaged portions show no signs...
If you sell before the pyramid fails, you've done well financially. That's when most of the con men sell because they know what they are selling...
[ATTACH]
Not a chance. I've got too many coins that don't leave me satisfied with a perfect attribution, but the search is a joy. Anyway, I wouldn't have...
I have no doubt it's not a S-202, but looking only at the reverses of S-187 and S-202, it appears to be a reverse of 99 using a strong C from...
I'm still open to a new mule or even a new die.
This was $63.95. it's an eBay purchase that was relisted at least once. I tried to get it under $50 but the seller wouldn't budge. I decided not...
messed up. Can't delete.
Another Island of misfit coins pickup. Excellent detail and severe rim damage, but pretty clean surfaces otherwise. [ATTACH]
It shows they are really close except for the bottom right of the C.
How about S-167?
It wouldn't be the first time I was left with an attribution with something which bugged me. Like a broken loop that isn't supposed to be broken....
The Obverse looks right. But check the reverse. Here are the S-179 and the S-202 and tell me which looks closer? [ATTACH]
What an appropriate name. Eat your bitcoins MIDAS.
It has no intrinsic value. Only speculative value. So as long as you can find new suckers, you're good.
Separate names with a comma.
