This appears with laminations on each side on the left side of the coin. This would not likely be the high quality high quality Taylor & Bailey...
I'm off post. I was looking at the 1914 Liberty Nickel.
Is that a proof or just proof-like? Fantasy or Pattern?
This is my photo of the S-187. I like it a little darker than the seller. [ATTACH]
My suspicion is that the removed spot was in the field next to the chin since there is a break in the luster between IT and the chin. But it was...
It's always fun to find out that you're older than the collectable coins in the thread.
Congratulations! These little surprises are the best.
The 18 came in: It has a strong edge and is sub-variety b with the edge of 94. I can now also report that both the obverse and reverse have large...
This is my final Photo Layout. Really: [ATTACH]
This is my final Photo Layout:
It's too bad the 26 isn't your coin. They make a great visual combo with similar grade, condition and toning.
There are cracks all over the legend including the top of OF.
Looks like a nice example of O-101. A 7 over 6 overdate variety. This one with nice reverse cracks.
I was just checking the Overton and it's either the latest O-103 or the first O-103a. The defining break between S O is probably there with a...
[ATTACH] I got a surprise when the S-64 came in. An edge blunder with the extra R and leaf.
This is the edge of the S-64. It shows a second R and Leaf. [ATTACH]
I was trying to take some photos tonight, but the digital microscope appears to be fogging up leaving a cloudy photo. I really like coins with a...
Oops! I meant S-69 or S-70. The obverse is 36, but the reverse doesn't have sufficient detail for an attribution.
I can't tell if the first is S-69 or S-79. The second looks like S-43.
Learning is a lifetime pursuit.
Separate names with a comma.
