After a little research, it appears that both the Details and the Net Grade are discounted when there is corrosion. A straight graded VF has far...
I make no claim to be a Nickel guy. 43 MS67 - No FS 45 MS65 - No FS (close, but no cigar - breaks in the bottom row)
[ATTACH] It made me buy it. It is the siren call of early copper. BTW, It is probably the 11th known of this variety. Obverse was paired with 6...
I like the detail, but the comps are pretty toughly graded In my humble opinion. I think they might have net graded in order to get a straight...
I know it's considered Scudzy for moderate to severe corrosion. But what you you guys think this will details grade and net grade? ps You can...
[ATTACH]
I was able to make a buy it now deal with the seller. It will disappear from eBay, but rest assured it has found a good home where it will be...
I struggle with this post. I have many friends here and I'd love to give each a personal heads up on this one. So I'll share it with all....
[ATTACH] This is really odd. The crack looks right, but the 9 tilts wrong, the 1 & 7 seem to be at a different spacing over the dentils.
[ATTACH] This is a head-scratcher. The reverse appears to be solid as 1798 Reverse N. But the LIBERTY spacing seems like a solid Obverse 16 and...
This is a rare time my photo shows the break better than the seller's photo.
This is a S-262 R3 variety. But it is the extremely rare Die State III with a break over STAT. [ATTACH]
It came in and is much lighter than the photos. Maybe because he was highlighting the counterstamp. Here is his photo and mine follows. I think...
Apparently both NOYES and Breen do show more than one State B which is the equivalent of what would be Breen II. Looking at the photos. it is...
Yeah. That's where I'm at too. Neither Breen nor Noyes show this die state, but it was mentioned at the sale of the Holmes collection where I...
This is one of the last 1796s I needed. It has some issues, but the surfaces are nice. It is not unlike the S-101 in this regard. [ATTACH] Thank...
I just picked up this 1796 NC-4 with a counterstamp, though countermark might be technically correct since it is engraved. It is my third. [ATTACH]
I went for a low price early Large Cent and thought I was picking up a S-22. But it turned out to be S-29. I wanted to get a variety with the R...
My second set of TRIPLETS. New [ATTACH] to go with: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] The other set is 1803 NC-1
Separate names with a comma.
