You have to be picky with the deep mirror PLs. I've seen some 65s and 64s that look like they have road rash. The one in the OP is outstanding....
I had the same confusing thought you originally said $2000. According to the PCGS priceguide, in non-cameo 1899 PF60: Morgan is $1500 Barber...
The think the original anacs would give a separate grade for the reverse and for the obverse.
Gotcha. Just seemed like some were saying to do that. I've had coins like yours where I thought there was noway in hell that is the correct...
Here some recent auction results:[ATTACH]
PF67
So why waste any money resubmitting it?
Wow that is pretty. MS64+
lol. I was still stuck on the limited edition silver proof set. But, your collection pic is also awesome!!
It is a very well designed presentation. I love how you can see all the coins in a single view. And the black/dark grey background makes...
The logical side of me thinks the limited edition silver proof set is simply another way to repackage all the same stuff. But I do own a year...
Thanks for posting, great read.
Do you plan on selling it or keeping it?
She prefers you call them “beauty marks”.
Did NGC have an issue with the 2 long scrapes from the 9 to TrVst ? I did. Doesn’t stop me from loving it.
[ATTACH]
You mean Morgandudes? I didnt post my reverse and wasnt trying to hijack his thread. It was really more a comment that I cant tell from his...
MS63. Is that a scrape on Monticello? If so, I dont know the grading impact of something like that.
Morgandude sounds like a pro. But it is amazing what the slightest change in light will do in these “quickpics”. Here is mine 04 O (which I like...
To me, the original pic is just a tad blurry. Is that 2 hits right on her jawline and one just below her eye? Maybe a tiny one on her forehead....
Separate names with a comma.
