Specifically, the Reverse of 1989 is RDV-006 (CONECA). Go to Error-ref.com, Part III: Die installation errors. Lincolncentresource.com lists it...
In Dec. 1988 the Mint ran out of reverse working dies and were compelled to use the new RDV for 1989. This new RDV was essentially the same but...
…What’s on the reverse? @Aarron
…Not only common but also very little eye appeal with the stain on the date.
All aboard!!…(chugga chugga chugga……..)
VF Details (cleaned). There are several letters on the reverse starting to blend into the rim, and this indicates a VG8-10 to me. But the...
…and you are off and running with your next thousand. Mine made it 23,014. Congrats!
No. “Interior die break” (IDB) is what would be correct. The older name used was “die chip” and it referred to part of the die “chipping off”...
Obverse VG8, reverse G6.
No, not with the abrasions on the hair over the ear, the cheek and the jaw, as well as the base of the bust. A switch would account for this as...
…I only hit post once but 4 iterations showed up.
…except that people do stuff like this just to see if they can…it doesn’t matter if the coin is more or less valuable.
Yes, indeedy!…I think we have a case of the ol’ switcheroo here!
Every step is broken by the contact mark/hit. Not even a 1FS.
No. It’s part of the normal design. NGC has pictures to compare to.
More info: the obverse has a rim, which means the coin was “upset” properly (in the Upsetting Mill) which creates the rims on both sides. Yet,...
Normally you would be directed to error-ref.com but the site is currently down due to an expired security certificate (we think). BUT…you can...
VG8 obverse, G4 reverse.
VG8. And I would like to add a novel concept: an example of “anti-pareidolia”. You have a coin you thought might have been pareidolia and it...
Separate names with a comma.
