For most of your reasons, I did as well. My initial focus was no more CPZ cents and it escalated to all denominations. I began to split my...
One clear, in-focus close-up was more than adequate. It may be too late, now, to edit your post to remove the extraneous pics…however… After...
Great condition for $20…PCGS Photograde shows it to be XF45 (ballpark) which calculates from Numismedia/FMV to be approx. $147.00. (halfway...
I wouldn’t pull that trigger yet, we can’t see enough to say one way or the other. Newer members sometimes forget to provide critical pics of what...
Need a close-up.
Glad you are back and able to post. Sometimes we have a devil of a time taking care of priorities. Take me, for example: earlier this week I...
I agree there is a benefit to having a TPG authenticate, certify and protect a coin, but it needs to meet some qualifications: 1. Meet the value...
2009 is another year with hundreds…I just went through those with an Early Childhood I had since 2015 that I somehow had missed checking…so I...
Not only small value, but if you take any 2006 cent, Philly or Denver, and look for a doubling match on Wexler you will be cured of searching...
The A/DOLLAR appears to be Class VIII, Tilted Hub doubling. Yes to the obverse die gouge, but I see nothing else of import. Class VIII is a very...
I agree NT would not equal impairment, but these two have carbon spotting and stains as well. That does not indicate proper...
You need a better scope/camera that has 3 megapixels minimum. The pixelation on this pic is very bad, to the point I can’t really see what you...
Please provide better pictures. I can’t see what you’re talking about.
MS64
Flat and shelf-like, mechanical/machine doubling. This happens when the coin shifts in the collar when struck. I do not see any erosion of the...
Mimi…as noted, this is from a worn, overused die. The LIBERTY effect seems to me to be the slight wear on the top of the letters that is...
Got a close-up? Without a closer view I suspect a fake. To be fair, with a closer view I might have the same opinion.
After comparing to yours and researching, this one does look to be polished. Neither NGC nor PCGS list a proof for a 1925-S California (Diamond...
THAT is a mighty-fine commemorative! I’ll jump out in the deep end and say it is a Proof 65. Super surface. Super luster. Super strike.
Separate names with a comma.
