This is classic Die Deterioration Doubling which has no premium associated with it.
I don't believe that the lettering is indicative of machine damage since the lettering closest to the edge of the coin usually appears "flattened"...
Me too since it's highly questionable.
Classic Machine Doubling.
It looks chemically damaged instead of improperly annealed. The darker areas around United States of America should be the clue.
Very interesting 1983.
The end of the inner loop on the 9 is too "blunt" to be a SD. It needs to be tapered more to a point.
Perhaps. But then, maybe someone will screw up and include one of the 50th Anniversary Coins in the set thereby creating a crazy rush rarity like...
Already Covered here: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/new-3-coin-kennedy-set-offered-by-mint.255333/
95%
Not a DDR not a DDO. Just a beat up working hub that made it through several years of production beginning in 1972. 1973 [ATTACH] [ATTACH] 1972...
I have nothing to say on this other than, what goes around comes around.
One Year, I bought a 32 bill sheet of one's to give to my kids. I took it into work so that I could cut it into two 16 note sections. One fella...
I concur!
Check out this 1954-S. [ATTACH]
Why do you consider that coin a keeper?
5 out of 10 times, that "self sufficiency" becomes a 1964-D Accented Hair Kennedy Half Dollar or in this case, a 1990 No S Lincoln Cent. Mocking...
You are right. There is such a thing as a stupid question. Namely, the question that isn't asked.
Only in a non-collectors eyes.
That would have been a Way Cool find! [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
