:jawdrop:
Genuine. Typical crappy New Orleans strike.
For those wondering: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/need-help-grading.279102/ And...
No, the other proof 1970 S quarter that was struck on a 1913 Barber quarter. This further my belief that these are not legitimate mint errors as...
Its was acually struck at the mint, but I do not think it is a legitimate error because it HAD to have been mint-assisted. "Error" implies "by...
I can't find a "thumbs up" emoji... Glad it worked out for you. :)
Buying those two lots of cents would have paid for my next year of college. I wish I had seen them. So envious... :arghh:
That's what I was thinking.
It looks like this coin was scraping against another coin for quite some time. I'd call it MS-60.
I use a slide box that would normally hold 2x2 slides for a slide projector. The coins are held in 2x2 envelopes as I want to be able to easily...
:facepalm:
What he said, you lucky dog! :jawdrop:
My gut feeling was AU-58, but your first pictures subdued the luster. Seeing the new pictures, it earns every point of that grade.
MS-64 for me.
+1
I agree with the sentiment about the market. I also prefer the dipped coin over the original coin. Would I buy it as a problem-free? No. But I...
I'm at AU-53. Not sure about the color, though. Love that obverse die crack!
The surfaces look very unnatural, but I have seen worse in straight-grade holders.
No offense, but I'd rather spend that kind of money on a nice MS-65+ WLH for my type set. Down the road, these may become more valuable, but our...
Not yet...
Separate names with a comma.
