I still refuse to accept market grading. It is just an excuse for the TPGs to justify being wrong.
Since you wanted PCGS standards... [ATTACH] I say F-15
I figured the best way to sell it is to get MINT ERROR on the label.
Ah well. Still an error of sorts. And still worth more than $72, I would believe.
The luster is fairly strong. The lighting for that picture was really poor. It is hard to tell since the slab is so scuffed up, but I think there...
:) [ATTACH]
‘Tis NGC, sorry
Recently bought this for a song ($72). I guess everyone thought it was damage and not a lamination. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Have fun! :) The holder is really scuffed up. :/ Care to VAM @jtlee321 @Cascade ? [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Those are what statisticians call outliers. And on the other side, there are coins that sell for waaaay below value. Just take a gander at the $50...
:o
Why did you not pay with a payment method that would allow you to recover your funds? I NEVER pay without protection unless I either have the coin...
In a Facebook group dedicated entirely to rooting out scammers, a claim of someone scamming someone else is taken seriously ONLY if solid proof is...
I think that coin was made later than the time when dates were hand-punched into the dies.
S-204 it is, then. Thanks!
I am going to conclude my 1800 is S-204 and not NC-4 unless proven otherwise. It matches the striking characteristics (obverse swelling from TY to...
Doing some more reading, the obverse of NC-4 (obverse 13) is the original version of obverse 9. My coin seems to match the diagnostics of reverse...
If it is obverse 9, then it is a new variety. Five die pairs use obverse 9: S-199: On reverse berry across from E in UNITED has no stem. Mine has...
I hate 1800 large cents. I think S-209 is as close as I will get. Thoughts? @Marshall @Eduard I was also thinking S-198 (but no die crack over 1...
I like airplanes!
Separate names with a comma.
