“PCGS said it was right, so therefore it is right.” Here we go with that circular logic again...
So that one has a weak strike. But it is still a higher grade based on technical merits.
I disagree.
There is a HUGE difference between being lenient with minor damage accrued in circulation and major damage purposefully done to a coin. The first...
Yes, I get that for stuff like light scratches on G/VG coins, a minor hit or two, or an ancient cleaning. But if the coin is covered in cleaning...
“PCGS is right because they have to be right because they are the experts.” Hmmm... does that not sound like blatantly circular logic from...
For the record, one coin a pattern does not make. I’ve found PCGS to be quite consistent with Morgans. Which is worth more: the coin, or the...
That one is just ugly. Gentle tapping usually does the trick
Mine are en-route to their recipients! :)
Sasly, I do not have any bigas, trigas, nor quadrigas. :(
I bought it from a We Buy Gold shop with 2 other 1885 O Morgans which were similarly toned. (The dealer charged me $17 each because they were...
I chose not to participate since everyone else already said what I thought. I opened this thread expecting another GC vs TrueView debate, and I...
The mystery on the receiving end is part of the excitement. :)
When I talk about coins, I always start with the story behind the coin. It piques and maintains interest.
I was agreeing with you and providing additional justification in case someone did not fully understand what you meant
I posted this one for discussion, not for points
Ah. Oops
There is no way for that pattern to form while sitting in a bag.
Here’s a fun one with a fun story to it. :) [ATTACH][ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Maybe you glimpsed the future! :astronaut::blackalien::borg::doctor::oldman:
Separate names with a comma.
