K
You’re the one who openly supports ever-changing standards, regardless of their fallacy and negative impact on the hobby as it sits today.
1887 comes to mind
The fact that a single point difference can mean thousands of dollars in value means that changing standards are actually harmful to the hobby....
In case anyone is wondering [ATTACH]
Looks exactly like it should. NT
VF-25 was my first thought, but I have seen VF-30s with about the same feather detail on the reverse
So if I have a coin with a few scattered hairlines, it’s grade is a total crapshoot?
So what is the answer to the question posed in the title of this thread? I am seeing a whole bunch of “there is no set rule” and “set standards...
I was specifically referring to die polish
Morgans can have fields with booming luster and frosty devices and be covered in die polish lines. Gold coins are no different
Even with the hole?
I still think most of that is die polish
How else are you supposed to cope with ever-changing standards without having to re-educate yourself? I think you are just countering everything I...
Make sure it is fully-charged, and leave before they figure out what the battery symbol means. :vamp:
And deniers. ;)
*re-education. Kinda hard to learn a standard when it is always changing (aka: there are no standards).
And how are the TPGs supposed to be reliable if the goalpost is always moving?
@Ken Dorney knows charms
The timing was bad for me, so I could not bid though there are several I wanted to bid on. :( I habitually buy coins from Metz because I really...
Separate names with a comma.
