Here it is copied over from the star thread. And I was comparing the GC photos when saying the star is 1-1.5 pts nicer....
I was comparing the two using the same GC photos and to me the 67 star was a superior coin. The mark on the non-star is in an area of the obverse...
Green ...it looks acceptable for a 65 (not PQ in my opinion, but at least "B" level).
So I mentioned there being two of these, here is the other 1950-D nickel that was originally in the same auction. Should it star? [IMG] [IMG]
Summary: Rd. 1: 1955-S MS 64 1c (NO Star) --> Should it star? -->Yes: 2 vs No: 11 Rd. 2: 1885-O MS 65 $1 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs...
When I was bidding on the coin that @Lehigh96 posted, I was also bidding on the coin below. Both had the same grade, but to me this coin looked to...
It might just be the photos, but the areas around the letters (especially on the reverse) looks like evidence of cleaning. That was what made me...
@geekpryde you are up... followed by Wxcoin and then ldhair
@jom interesting journey that coin took and unfortunate that you weren't able to get the grade. From what I've seen, it appears you would have to...
Summary Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65...
Si Señor :D:D [MEDIA]
@jom you can call this one when you’re back on ...and please let us know the rest of the story :)
I’ll go MS 66
AU 55
I’ll go with B is the higher grade on the slab. I like A more.
That’s fair. And if you send it with other items, that certainly does minimize the costs associated (and appearance review is free). I did realize...
My error. I fixed the above comment. current order is: Geekpryde Wxcoin ldhair
You will be up right after geekpryde and wxcoin (who are next after this coin is revealed).
I agree. Both the grade and steps designation is suspect. Did you send it in yourself or buy it already graded? As for sending it in for...
Anyone else?
Separate names with a comma.
