64, maybe PL
https://coins.ha.com/itm/morgan-dollars/1884-cc-1-vf30-pcgs-pcgs-population-9-46061-ngc-census-5-23910-mintage-1-136-000/a/131643-27285.s?hdnJumpTo...
An absolute beauty! Here are some silvers from Metz. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1884 CC Morgan, unsurprisingly
I can get behind this
But lookie here! Also taken right off of PCGS’s website. Inconsistency much? [ATTACH]
Incredible coin. I admired this one in your PL set. You have a great eye. I have always followed that advice. I know a special coin when I see...
AU-58 net MS-65. :D
But my actions would then have altered the coin so that it is no longer in the same state as it left the mint in. That’s my point.
So, naturally, a line must be drawn. Wear is a convenient line between circulated and uncirculated.
Exchanging money at the mint counts as commerce. ;)
Had to get it from the bank. That counts as commerce.
Putting a coin in a coin cabinet means that the coin had been put into circulation and was taken out of circulation. But regardless, it sure...
Who wants to go tell PCGS that their published standards are wrong? :D [ATTACH]
If the coin has wear, it is not uncirculated. What do you not understand? As for my comment, I was referring to marks on the surfaces. It seems...
I have a feeling you did not even read the words I wrote. I did not say anything remotely resembling “coins don’t circulate.” I only said that...
It’s what they do with everything, so AU/UNC is no different So, are you saying the TPG’s bottom line is what drives grading decision?
I did learn, but from atricles written over the past two decades, from dealers, from grading instructors, and from experts with more knowledge and...
We are probably better off ditching the numbers and just going with the letters. And this shows how you abandon FUNDAMENTAL numismatic...
I use both interchangeably, along with state of preservation. But with regards to the number, I almost exclusively use “grade”
Separate names with a comma.
