Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC...
My guess was 66 before the reveal. PCGS (and NGC) won't put the RPM unless one pays the extra fee for it.
It can be difficult as many dealers have their own pricing. I've seen dealers offer very close to greysheet and others are quite a bit lower. It...
*Note: I'll update summary info after the dime posted by @Publius2 My thinking is that the dime is original, solid for the grade, and JA liked...
I think the speculation on the reasoning is what Physicsfan wrote: "I honestly don't know how JA feels about fingerprints, but some of those...
As always proofs are hard to judge from photos. I see nothing wrong with this one-and it actually might be better (and appears to show some cameo...
@ldhair you can post next
It depends on a number of factors. ~Big sellers who have developed a following do better ~Timing matters (auctions ending early in the morning...
It looks solid from what I can see...YES on a GREEN sticker
MS 66 close to 5fs, but I think it just misses it. The luster look strong...nothing about the color suggests a star to me ...nice coin overall
Floor is open...
It happens to the best of us. You provided solid reasoning. Stick around and contribute more often. :)
The thread that you may be referencing had 65/66 coins that were bumped into the 66-68 range. I'm not a fan of the practice as it can distort the...
I found this thread that has a lot of info https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1017514/help-needed-from-franklin-variety-collectors-specialist
I'll say YES to the GREEN I see a few hits/marks and potentially something to the right of the nose (could just be the plastic from the holder or...
That seems correct to me. It has the look of a proof. Aren't the rims square? And just the general look does not resemble anything I've seen on a...
Separate names with a comma.
