Nero [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Elagabalus [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Contantine I [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Edward I for his treatment of the Scotts [ATTACH]...
Wow. Just wow. Purely a work of art
A fake? ;)
The lack of luster in the fields and on the devices makes me think XF-45
There is a clear and significant loss of luster in the fields, as well as on the portrait and the high points.
“Flipping” sounds like selling in a short time (and is used EXCLUSIVELY in that context), but still requiring the effort to sell. I don’t know...
Sellers can’t leave negative feedback for buyers.
I know that feeling well. But I rationalize it by knowing that it happened because a better opportunity lies down the road. Every experience I’ve...
If you want to devote the time and effort, you could become a coin flipper, but it takes very deep pockets and lots of luck to be a successful...
Though this denier fort of Lyon is said to have been struck ca 1100, its style has led some to attribute the coin to Charles the Bald [ATTACH]...
Off-center requires part of the design on BOTH sides to be missing. Otherwise, it is just a MAD
AU-55. This is one of my favorite issues, and you got a stellar example.
It does have to be a complete loop to be a retained cud, and I am not sure if it is complete of this coin. Pretty coin, though.
I love Hekena’s hairstyle on that coin!
I see 1917
Upon a second look, I see my guess of 50 was definitely too low, bu I’m just still not seeing 58 luster. I’m with @C-B-D and liking her better at...
Photograde does not account for strike variability and design changes, so Photograde is practically useless for coins like capped bust halves
Nice AU-50
Same here. The only aureus I want is an example with Boscoreale toning. Otherwise I’d rather have a variety of EF denarii. Edit: here is a dream...
VF-25 and VF-20. @Insider I see some hints of original mint luster on the first VF coin. ;)
Separate names with a comma.
