@Treashunt is the go-to person for Red Books as he wrote the reference for them.
Here is a slightly different one that sold for $75 (USD) in May 2020 on eBay....
Bringing this back with a Morgan I used to own: [ATTACH]
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC...
If all of them would have been graded, I'd guess a majority are still 70s (maybe 60/30/8/2 split for 70/69/68/67 or lower) Edit: I'd also guess...
I echo the 4 votes (for the same reasons)
I'm also in the 63-64 camp on these. Maybe the best can squeeze out a 64+/65 (if given the "CC bump"). If grading, I'd only pick the ones from...
Condolences on your loss.
MS 64
It's a legitimate ICG slab. The photo isn't great and makes the toning look unattractive (it might be but we can't tell for certain). From what I...
While the official definition of these GEM Proofs is 65 or higher, my guess is that most are 68s (or even 69s). The dealers are mainly looking for...
Here is the answer from an NGC employee on their forum: "Gem Proof is a term that is only used for certain bulk submissions if the submitter...
@NPCoin that was much better said. I was referencing what you said but my initial comment was a poor way of phrasing it.
I'd say for most the answer is no. No matter how expensive your collection, you can't use inflation to your benefit on taxes. One instance where...
It goes back to the two main points already made in this thread: 1. You can't use it for your taxes 2. Many view it as a hobby and some don't...
I'll go with a 3 ..it's nice but at least one step below the previous world coin we had.
It has the look that I associate with whizzed coins (hard to explain exactly in this case). It could just be the poor photo and it's a...
It's possible. Either way (like others have mentioned), it's something that is better to pass on than gamble on (and then have to deal with...
Or possibly Whizzed ...has the look of being "worked" on
Separate names with a comma.
