MS 65 and not FBL (I believe I see a break) ....outside possibility of UNC Details Environmental Damage
For this date that grade isn't common. Plus, there are very few known toners graded PR 70 (I saw only one within the last year).
Hi all, A few items are posted below. Shipping is free unless otherwise stated). Payment via paypal (usually G&S, unless otherwise stated....for...
An attractive PR 68
Anyone else?
The reverses of each can be seen in the links below: https://collectivecoin.com/AuroraBorealis/0u0KHeuautBMTpYKnYJm/oc1hRVEy73Ae8jnbJosT...
81-S is the poster/upper end for a 6 87 isn't as nice as the 81-S but still squeezes into a 6
@CircCam where were you on the nickel (I left it TBD for now) @Morgandude11 you can post your next examples
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
Floor is open...
MS 67 5FS
MS 64
Nice progress and you're over half way there (at least mathematically). :D
That's a lovely set and a true testament to taking your time to find the special examples.
MS 64 PL ...nice overall with the reed marks on the cheek plus some field hits being the grade limiters
Reminder for those just tuning in, we are commenting on both of these: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC...
@wxcoin your track record is perfectly respectable and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. :D Proof coins are harder to judge from photos and...
You are correct. Coins are subjective and toning is even more so. The true monsters (level 6) are fairly rare and I would think there would be...
@CircCam ’s Jefferson from the prior page is still in play and let’s do the Morgan that @Morgandude11 posted too. The Morgan looks like a 3
Separate names with a comma.
