MS 65 ...looks to have solid luster (like the other that I called a 65 too)
MS 64
MS 65
Great analysis @Publius2 ....you covered a lot of my concerns and even more beyond ....now to see if we are right or way off. :p
I'll update summary info after this round. I see what look to be adjustment marks and a spot in the hair. I'm not sure how CAC views this. I...
I'll guess MS 66. I've seen a few like this where the image (and probably the in-hand look) isn't super appealing but the coin gets a high grade....
It looks to already be PCGS graded. You are correct that these aren't worth grading if the coin is below a 65 FBL since 64 FBL examples can be...
MS 64 FBL ....too many hits to go 65 in my opinion
There isn't a way to get an exact date, just a range based on the holder generation. See here: https://www.pcgs.com/holders
NGC changed it some years back. https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/2818/NGC-CrossOver-Special/ "NGC modified its CrossOver policy in January...
5.1 ....I like it ....the hits are there but it looks perfectly acceptable as a 63. Unfortunately NGC does not allow cross overs for anything...
Any more guesses before @Juno reveals it?
@Morgandude11 you are up...
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
Was yours not toned? I'd be interested in seeing it as I have only seen them with stars or no grade (Uncirculated label).
The contract for the Battle Creek hoard had an agreement that every straight graded coin received a star. The other coins are just marked as...
I'll just have to disagree here. To me they are neutral. I can see someone paying a premium for them but the majority of people would not.
They are all ok, but they just don't have the colors (or coverage) to be much more than high 2s. These are the coins that end up making the star...
Separate names with a comma.
