As mentioned by @longshot , it is unlikely that the color will significantly progress unless those holders have something in them (paper label) or...
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
Alert worked this time....but notice I was the first to post on this thread. :D
MS 63 PL ...baggy but not enough to fall to 62...the photo shows enough contrast to make me fairly confident it is at least a PL but not enough to...
I agree with @brg5658 As long as the label says what it is, there isn't much issue slabbing it. In fact, NGC adding all the info to the slab...
I've also seen the modern 80s-90s in PL but don't recall many earlier dates (I believe there are some PL war nickels too).
I went with MS 66 ...looks clean overall with only a few noticeable ticks on the cheek area. I'm guessing luster is solid. I personally think the...
@Lehigh96 is 1959 known to be a date more commonly encountered with semi-pl or is it just a coincidence that someone else also has one on eBay?...
I noticed the same about the PCGS slab and that helped me eliminate circulation wear. My guess was struck through like @BuffaloHunter but I think...
I'm not sure if I ever confirmed it, but I believe after the first 3 or 4 tags, the rest don't work (when it's in one post). I did not get...
When it's blast white, I tend to prefer the look of a pl (or even semi-pl) coin. So I voted for the second coin. I'm guessing the first is MS 66+...
Separate names with a comma.
