I was between 65 and 66 but went 65 (continuing with my theme of decreasing grades :p) ....it definitely looks like the weakest reverse among the...
Also in the pretty but not quite there camp...a solid 3.7
@kSigSteve you are up
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
I'm progressively decreasing my grades as these threads continue... MS 66 here ...there are some hits/marks scattered throughout and the cheek has...
First impression made me think this was on par with the prior coin; however, I bumped it down 0.5 points based on the hit to the left of the dome...
#1 ...2.0 ...same reasoning as Lehigh #2 ...1.9....minimal toning
MS 67 not fs ...very clean and lustrous...steps have breaks which prevent the designation
I agree that some labels are silly and personally don't feel the need to pay extra. I also understand that quite a few collectors stick to the...
@SSG_Gonzo you are up @kSigSteve you are on deck
Someone has to be first. :p I'll go second and guess MS 63 RB ....it looks fairly clean but being a semi-key date, I doubt it is graded that high...
Top MS 65; bottom QC? (I like the top better, regardless of PCGS grade)
QC/AT but I like the pattern [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I could see it being sea salvaged or buried in the ground.
I need to update some summary info...then after this round, the order is: @SSG_Gonzo @kSigSteve
First impression was AG 03 so I will stick with that.
5.7 ..it's up there among commems, especially for the Pan Pac.
This is my latest update (still current): https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ddddd%E2%80%99s-box-of-20-updated-version-3-0.369217/
It's only complete when you decide it is complete. :D Some are satisfied when every spot is filled and move on to something else. Others keep...
Separate names with a comma.
