Can you tell if it's aluminum, white metal, bronze, etc? Looks to be one of the Eglit-55 versions. I see $75+ (mainly graded though) so it seems...
MS 66 ...luster carries it above a normal gem
I like it as a 4.1 ...it's interesting that only one toned like that despite all being in the same packaging and likely being in the same...
This was a fun exercise! ddddd vs actual 1) 67 vs 67 (correct) NGC 2) 66+ vs 65 (+1.5) ICG 3) 66 vs 67 (-1) NGC 4) 65 vs 65 (correct) ICG 5) 66...
I like it but less than the Washington quarter ....3.3
PCGS PL 64 from @spirityoda is up now [IMG]
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
I'll guess AU 55
First thought was MS 64 (although those that say AU 58 have made me waver a bit, I'm sticking to my first impression)
I like ships on coins/tokens and gave this one an 8.
@spirityoda we will go with your Canadian 25 cents this evening and @expat you can post tomorrow evening ...everyone else please hold off until...
6.5 on the Morgan
2, 3, & 8 for me ....8 slightly edges out the rest for my favorite as I like the city view designs
Very British indeed. :p I like the balance between very modern (21st century) and more classic (18th & 19th century). :)
MS 67 ....just misses FS (this one was closer than any of the others in my view)
Something about this one says MS 67 to me (and it looks better than the prior 3 which I called 66+)...still not FS
MS 66+ ...I'm staying consistent on threads #9 through #11 as they all look about equal to me
MS 66+ ....again nicer than a 66 but not quite a 67
That's the spot which made me think it missed the 5fs designation (forgot to vote on the steps though :banghead:). I went with 66+ as it looked a...
They are all cool! I only voted for my #1 favorite, the 1808 10 Cash. I'm not sure I can give a specific reason as to why besides it speaks to me...
Separate names with a comma.
