I've made a few midsummer trips to FL on business (another industry), and don't have the courage to do it again. The heat and bright sun really...
X marks the spot . . . I think you're supposed to get out your pickaxe and shovel and dig there, Randy.
Sure looks awfully lifeless to me for a coin retaining so much detail . . . I think this coin has been ruined.
Too much time and energy is involved in producing coins like that, so yes, it must be rare.
From my post, “ . . . adequately protect it from taking by others” is intended to include government actors. While paper money can be debased,...
Thus my use of the word adequately . . . I consciously decided not to use "completely", as that is not a defendable position.
Digital currency is a bad idea for one reason, and one reason only . . . you cannot take physical possession of it and adequately protect it from...
Great, sound advice . . .
Hey Skip, I think your statement went a bit further than “suggesting” the coin is not real.
Like for gold coins, errors on larger silver coins were frowned upon at the US Mint, particularly if the coins were, or even appeared to be...
Nice error coin!
There are some poorly struck examples of the 83-CC Morgan (a couple of PCGS examples below) so one should be careful about dismissing poorly...
No grade . . . No coin!
Definitely send . . . looks MS66 to me.
That coin is not mint state.
I'm right with @dddd at MS62.
I give up . . . [IMG]
EF45
I think I've got a Bechtler Dollar coming up in a collection I offered on and the seller recently accepted. If my recall is good, it is a very...
Definitely post mint damage. There are visible pockets of originally minted surfaces in tight to the raised devices for easy visual reference:...
Separate names with a comma.
