Looks to be way less field and device marks/rubs/hits than most P or N 65s IMHO... In other words this was a good buy IMHO if you paid 65 money...
Wow, very nice appearance and why a nice satiny specimen can equal aesthetically a PL or even DMPL coin. Looks 66ish without checking the...
Pictures: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yikes Waste
T, a bit typical for 70s mint sets as it was the 80s that saw mintages plummet.
Was a mild challenge to find the date - take a look...
I like this variant, just issued by the Mexico City mint. Date: 2022 Mintage: 300 pcs Size: 5 ounces, 0.999 fine[ATTACH][ATTACH]
Hmm, in hand the coin looks good as far as the devices - excellent in fact. It is not a valuable coin but thought the toning nice & agree the...
Sorry I left this thread to flounder in history! Well, the Liberia coins I would classify as more "satin" in appearance similar to matte but IMHO...
Not to really push this but the top on reverse from 9 to 2 o'clock may well have been affected by die grease or similar. Similar to the obverse,...
I like the toning, looks to have just missed FSB: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Not to sound too authoritative, but it most certainly is. I actually love the simplicity of the reverse design - almost reflecting the wren on the...
Fairly graded and happy I got this one....
Ah will do.
Yes, a bit nervous how this one works out & will keep all posted - think I will submit at the Baltimore show this fall....
Thanks for the advice. Yes, I will along with the 1852 C $5 at the next Baltimore show. I had good fortune having gotten a very nice 1932 S...
Indeed Bought in English auction. actually I have gotten rather nice coins there before I buy GB coins frequently at many of these auction houses...
Yes, absolutely a good point JM and I (probably most of us) need to really look carefully at the third side as you've said.
I got this recently at auction as it is better than the one I have - can’t afford the higher denominations in any kind of grade that I’d like![ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
