Hey Ikeigwin, you forgot the 56-S :smile
And here is the 56-D and S OMM that is so controversial [IMG]
OK, it's 12:15AM on 9/16, time for 1956 Here's a 1956-D RPM #4: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
OK...Here's the comparison. Subject is a MS65 DMPL 1883CC Morgan Dollar. Lens is a 3x Nikon objective. Lighting is by a single diffused Jansjo...
That image is around 1.5x, so a 100% pixel crop should show a pretty good indication of what I'm talking about. I'll take some pics with my D7000...
Here's an interesting roll-end toner: [IMG][IMG]
Here's a 55-S RPM [IMG][IMG]
Double-checked my notes and the shot above was actually at 3x and then cropped... The lens was a 3x Nikon Measuring Microscope objective on...
Here's a detail shot at 5x of the mintmark on that 57-D cent. This was with the T2i again. At this magnification, my D7000 was a disaster. [IMG]
Thanks! I found that in an OBW roll. A total of 19 coins were dramatically toned. This was one of the nicer ones.
I find that even for 0.8:1 (Cent shots), shutter shake kills the pixel-level sharpness. Around 0.4:1 (Dollar shots), the difference is very small...
Separate names with a comma.
