I see MD on the date. Not a doubled die.
In my mind, PCGS>NGC>ANACS>ICG ANACS is pretty solid when it comes to slabbing varieties that don't appear in the Cherrypicker's guide. I would...
I'm not really seeing any split serifs. Read this thread that I posted a while back. It shows visual differences between a doubled die, which has...
While there are flow lines on the coin, the rough, pitted appearance of the anomalies do not really match up with what I have seen in terms of die...
Almost seems like a new adage of "buy the coin, not the slab" even though the coin in the auction is still slabbed...
Coin 1: Most likely damage Coin 2: Plating issues Coin 3: Circulation wear/damage Coin 4: Same as coin 1
In my opinion, I think that the split serifs in the photos are actually just a result of light reflection. You saying "my scope hates bright...
I see no evidence of a doubled die, but then again, the pictures are really zoomed in. Most doubled dies should be easily visible under 10-20x...
Do you just mean "severe" (as in extreme) mechanical doubling? I have never heard the phrase "severed machine doubling".
I don't think it's a doubled die.
Looks like the 2 took a hit or was otherwise damaged. I would guess the reverse looks thicker from a combination of die fatigue and combination...
Apparently NGC did not think it was cleaned...
I'm not really seeing anything that looks like a doubled die.
$18
I beg your pardon, but I think that comment was a bit uncalled for. All I was doing was sharing my observations from the photos provided, and to...
I see no evidence that suggests a doubled die on this coin.
This coin may not have been made in an attempt to deliberately fool anyone. It could have been a science project in which an extra plating of some...
I see mechanical doubling and not a doubled die.
Close, MS63. :) (Unless I missed something) http://www.pcgs.com/News/pcgs-certifies-first-confirmed-1974d-aluminum-cent
Mike Diamond for error coins.
Separate names with a comma.