Definitely replica currency. This is the Crutch Williams website @lettow mentioned. http://www.crutchwilliams.com/BogusCSA_RoTx.html
I know it says National Currency at the top of the note but collectors consider this a FRBN, not a National. Nice note !
Yes, the paper was thin on some of these Obsolete Civil War era bank notes. Yours looks legit.
I was using the mid-1870s price of gold.
It’s hard for @Gam3rBlake to wrap his head around the price of gold being $15 and ounce...
I don’t know for sure but I don’t see interchanging the different coins and bank notes as an obstacle.
It’s interesting, but not enough to justify keeping a $100 note.
I’m not familiar with them. Maybe @lettow will see this thread and have some information.
Congratulations @Molon Labe , she’s a beauty.
I thought THIS was the currency forum on Coin Talk ...
It’s when the 8-digit serial number reads the same backwards and forwards. A palindrome. This note is a radar. [ATTACH]
Ten dollars was Ten dollars back then. There was difference in the value of a $10 note depending on whether it was an SC or a GC.
Names like Radar and Repeater reference the entire 8-digit serial number. Yours is interesting as a short radar, but officially it’s nothing.
Wait, What !?
Nice.
Poorly centered note. Typically, to be considered an error, a portion of the adjoining note should be visible in the margin...as per my example....
Cool error note. Looks like a full face-to-back offset error. The note does have some wear and a nick in the upper margin, but still a nice note.
@physics-fan3.14 "Let me be clear: this is not an error at all. This is something someone intentionally made, abusing the machinery. It is not...
Nice pair of 1935D $1 SCs @coinup. Do us a favor and click on Full Image when posting photos. It keeps us from having to click on your thumbnail....
Low serial number and a true binary. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
