Hi Jello, Thanks, Bill
It is machine doubling combined with a little die deterioration doubling. Thanks, Bill
Hi, The top coin was struck by a die that was a little more worn than the bottom coin. That gives the appearance that the A and M are closer at...
It's damage. The reeded edge of another coin creates this kind of thing when it smacks up against the field of a coin.
Hi Michelle, I can't tell from the images. Bill
They'll grade it MS but it is AU 58 or so.
I don't see that I said anything personal about this particular seller. I posted general advice that applies to all sellers and buyers. Unless...
We see these occasionally . They are coins that tumbled for awhile inside the fin of a commercial clothes dryer. Do a search here for dryer...
Jason, Sometimes this kind of reprocessing involved dipping the coin into a material that would adhere to the coin. The way the coin was dipped...
25 cents.
The 1970 S is machine doubled. The 1968 S is the result of being struck by a die created from a very worn hub. Also, the 1968S looks like...
Phony indian cent errors are turning up too.....Beware!
Out of 1000 halves, i would say I see this kind of machine doubling on at least 200 coins. Very common and identified by the seller incorrectly....
That is a Nice find! Bill
This is probably a result of the die being filled with grease during the strike. The detail filled in will often not strike up or will be weak in...
It's BOGUS. It was probably done with a grinding wheel hence all the scrapes on the reverse. Thanks, Bill
The coin exhibits damage and is not an over mint mark. Thanks, Bill
It's genuine. It was struck on an incomplete planchet. Thanks, Bill
Hi, I can't see what you are trying to show us. As suggested the picture is too small. Thanks, Bill
Actually, The coin listed as GEM BU is nothing of the sort. It is a perfect example of the re-processed cents that I was talking about. It was...
Separate names with a comma.
