Winner! Both called it a 64. NGC did not give this one a star, so it was an easy decision to crack. A color bump could have taken it to a 65 but...
Anyone else?
@Mainebill @panzerman @Publius2 are a few people that I can think of that might have some experience with Heritage bidding? I unfortunately don't...
The second coin used to be NGC and is now in a PCGS holder. Please guess the grade from each grading company. Note: both the NGC photo and the...
Given it's close to 24 hours and some might be anxiously waiting for results, here they are: NGC called the coin MS 63 (no star) and PCGS called...
First: AU 55 Second: AU 58 ...both nice coins!
AU 55 ....I believe that I see some wear. That combined with some scattered marks/disturbances in the fields keeps it out of a 58 (despite what...
I revealed the grade above but without a picture (which might be a good strategy to keep people guessing since it is easier to scroll past a block...
PCGS photo loaded: [ATTACH]
What type of shake up are wanting? CAC entering the grading game? I’d enjoy hearing your ideas.
In general that is true. I wouldn’t try it on this coin.
I consider the Philippine and Hawaii issues as falling under US. An interesting tidbit is that the Philippine coins were convertible at a rate...
I'm guessing die polish lines
That's certainly a nice example for a Dansco album!
@jtlee321 you can guess on this one since you don't know. :D @Morgandude11 and others come on by too. :)
Also if anyone wants to discuss, what do you think is "better" in terms of details grades? Cleaned or Artificial Toning?
You all know the drill by now (see if I was crazy, wise, or somewhere in between). :p Having concluded the NGC portion, I move along to the PCGS....
Reveal.... another disappointment :( ....PCGS called it UNC Details Cleaned and NGC called it Unc Details Artificial Toning ....I didn't see any...
Glad to see you back! We missed you in the meantime. Nice photos as usual!
Separate names with a comma.
