Because we're introverts. We love coins so much that we can't help approaching them, even when they are guarded by scary, potentially vicious...
And, of course, not all coins of the same date/mint/variety with "the same grade" are equal.
Oh dear, Google's at it again. [ATTACH] The excerpt in the search result doesn't appear anywhere on the linked page. The Mints, combined, struck...
Six months?!!? That's not a grading company, that's off-site storage.
If it were a variety, I'd vote for calling it "Head in the Clouds".
The Fed says "yes".
Well, yeah, but they'd still be getting dropped/lost/tossed/accumulated in jars, so they'd "need" to keep striking them. As much as we "need" a...
I'm sure he was talking about @Barney McRae's post above. I'm inclined to agree with Jim; that sort of thing is probably better suited for...
The "unmistakable variety attribution" there is that it's 90% silver, which means it's 1964, and that there is no D mint mark in the relevant...
Seems unlikely. Looks like it's suffered some corrosion/damage, but most importantly, it doesn't seem to have a legible date. Without a date or an...
With that much of the rims present, I can't imagine it going lower than AG03. I'm not up on the conversion rates/correction factors in grading key...
Great, now I'm dizzy. :wacky:
Yeah, well I've got one with a 36,000,000° rotation! And several coins from the same year with matching rotations!
Surely you mean "inner front top"?
One of my aunts used to work for Doubleday, and the employees could buy "error" books at a substantial discount (or maybe they were free). I got a...
Separate names with a comma.
