@C-B-D there's another "rare" member currently posting about sending improbable coins to TPGs and then never doing so...same feller? ;)
A+ trolling. Super entertaining thread from a sideliner perspective. I hope no one believes this coin is ever getting sent to a TPG, the OP knows...
Could be a grease filled die, overpolished die or perhaps post-mint damage...no real added value that I can see.
How do we know the date is not a mangled 3 or 8? With so much obverse damage I don't think it's conclusively 1992.
Excellent, I see it. Good NW/SE distortion on the date
To the OP: since you are doubting the many experts that have spent years on this forum, the burden of proof falls on YOU to prove that it is an...
Hello, it is usually best to start your own thread rather than jump on another one. Your coin appears to be damaged with some glue residue on the...
Nice, looks like the DDR to me. Getting it graded is gonna set you back at least $50 so check ebay sold listings and other auctions its sold at to...
Both lincoln cents you have posted show different forms of post-mint damage.
Looks kind of like plating issues. Very common in late 1980s cents
I agree
I don't think you have it. E PLURIBUS UNUM on your coin shows no doubling.
Holy Moly!!! :dead:
Got it Barry, thanks
Thanks so much :) I went back to Wildwinds with your info and it looks like Thompson 190.1 to be exact
Thanks for the link. Reverse is similar but obverse looks different...
anyone got the attribution for mine? I'm having trouble finding an exact match on wildwinds. Flip it came in said 297-282 BC
Just picked up my first one! Been wanting one for a while because of the obverse design. Who else got 'em? Post yours here. [ATTACH]
@Salvador Rocha @Rick Stachowski Here is a helpful diagram showing the distinction between MD and a doubled die. Again your doubling looks flat...
All I see is machine doubling. No DDR. Doubling is flat and shelf-like, no split serifs.
Separate names with a comma.
