Not a rare holder. I will do a crackout for a couple of reasons. One being the slab sucks lol. Two im curious to see the edge of this coin. For...
I know right. ANACS mustard yellow holders are worse though.
Not ICG And there isnt a scratch on the coin. All scratches are on the slab itself
Haven't posted one in awhile so here ya go. Apologies as the slab is a bit of a mess. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] *Bonus points for guessing the TPG*...
Like above, just damaged.
Holy hell. That 1907 is fantastic:snaphappy:
The only article I have read about big tree was from numismatic news from 2011. Presses were sold to private owners in the 1950s in china.
What is the line above the N in ONE?
I dont care how long op says he has had the coin. It is fake.
Youre right Chris sorry I ever doubted. China never faked a coin before Big Tree:rolleyes: Ops coin is a fake.
Really? 1979 they werent making fakes?
People in this thread need to go read up on fakes. OP included. I actively collect morgans I know a fake when I see one.
THANK YOU. I know what the hell Im talking about with fake Morgans.
The reverse of the coin I posted is a fake 1895 from China on ebay right now. It has the same denticle flaws as ops coin.
Oh my lord.... I can tell you right now if... a big if... if this coin is real it would be graded details cleaned. If you have owned this coin...
Oh and the line on the N in ONE... find me the VAM where that is present.
Here im sure this could be in a type set as well. [ATTACH] Note the denticles at 7 o'clock.
Stain at 5 o'clock. What about 6 o'clock? No staining in that area. Yet the denticles look like dots in that area. Look closely at the coin. Coin...
Just saying it has that look. Typical chinese cast fakes look cleaned in the center with dark coloring around the rim. The reverse denticles are...
Where did you get this coin? It doesn't look right to me. The denticles between 4 and 6 o'clock on the reverse look like dots. The toning looks...
Separate names with a comma.
